Tracking ROI From Web Generated Leads
The number one priority for B2B web sites is lead generation. I'm convinced that B2B marketers are overemphasizing search engine optimization and pay per click tactics at the expense of ROI measurement.
I find that most B2B marketers (except those in large companies) are focused on search engines and generating more web traffic - based on the belief; that more traffic equals, more inquiries, equals more leads and more sales. This may true for B2C/B2B marketers with a transactional sale however, if you’re a B2B marketer, with a complex sale, this is just part of your battle.
If you are serious about tracking your website's return on marketing investment, it is imperative, that you go beyond the data collected in your web sites log files. Basic metrics such as; number of clicks, unique visitors, number of opt in e-mails gathered, and number of inquiries (forms) filled out are simply not enough.
Search marketing is important but not at the expense of ROI measurement. The top mandate from CEOs to marketing is to provide measurable ROI metrics. The bottom line is that marketers must prove their return on marketing investment (ROMI).
Mal Watlington, Contributing Writer for webpronews, wrote an article, “Getting the “R” in ROI from Web Generated Leads.” He writes, "In the B2B world, customer behavior and the length of the buying cycle make the connection between on-the-web activity and the decision to purchase much more difficult to trace."
I realize that tracking ROI may seem like a daunting task but it can be done. I'll show you how to track your website ROI...
Starting to track your web sites returned on investment
In a complex B2B sale, most of the selling actually occurs off-line. The sales process is a long series of micro conversions resulting from ongoing dialog – a conversation. The key is to tie both off-line and on-line activities together.
I view lead generation as an ongoing conversation that's both multimodal and iterative. To do this, you must begin with a holistic approach to lead generation and manage all of your touchpoints in your your CRM.
Common metrics for website ROI tracking:
# Of lead from inquiries
# Of visits to contact us pages (Visitor to inquiry conversion ratio?)
# Of white paper requests
# Of news letter registrations
# Of opt-in email addresses
# Of webinars registrations & # of attendees
# Of immediate sales ready leads
# Of inbound phone calls (click to call or chat)
Basic lead generation metrics:
# Of inquiries (Weakest)
# Of qualified leads (Weak)
# Of leads in sales process (Okay)
# Of opportunities in sales funnel (Better)
# Of closed deals (Best)
A few more analytics to consider if you use pay per click (PPC):
- Are you able to track which keywords are clicked on most frequently?
- Do you know which keywords produce the best inquiries?
- Which search engines and sites produce best inquiries? The most revenue and are the most profitable?
- Could you be paying for keywords that completely waste your sales team's valuable selling time? If so, do you know which ones?
- How much did your web site contribute your overall revenue? Can you prove it?
Conclusion
When you began thinking holistically, about your lead generation, you'll find many of these questions will come naturally. Put your focus on tracking metrics and microconversions that go beyond the lead (both on-line and off-line). You'll have no problem proving your worth to your CEO because you've documented return on marketing investment (ROMI) at every step.








The key to calculating an overall ROI is tracking all marketing and sales activities for each individual.
Then, it becomes clear which advertising, direct marketing, or other activities actually generated leads that became prospects and, eventually, customers placing orders.
This level of detail can be achieved when a company has a unified marketing and sales system that handles Web and e-mail marketing, offline marketing, and all sales activities.
One of the benefits of a unified system is that salespeople can see all marketing activities for a each prospect. In addition, marketers can track the revenue that results from their lead generation efforts.
Posted by: Cliff Allen | December 15, 2004 at 12:37 AM
Cliff,
Thank you for your comments and you bring up a really good point. Technology does matter but only when you have alignment between your team members.
I've discovered that the success of the unified system you describe is completely dependent on people and their team work which stems from their corporate culture.
In order to be successful companies need alignment. A new report by the CMO Council and Business Performance Management Forum found that companies could boost their bottom line if marketing and sales could just work together.
"800 senior marketing and C-level executives, 38% of respondents said they could boost incremental revenue by more than 20% if their company’s new business development practices were more effective...only 7% of respondents said their sales and marketing departments work together effectively."
I see that successful companies have figured out how to get - what I'll call the Bermuda Triangle of ROI - Sales, Marketing and IT aligned. I wrote a post a while back called, "Why IT Must Help Marketing and Sales Collaborate with Lead Generation."
Posted by: Brian Carroll | December 15, 2004 at 09:19 AM
Continuation from previous post... I agree with you that general metrics are not enough. In addition to getting new leads from your online/whatever marketing, qualifying them is critical. Even with a solid lead management program in place, often leads are passed through the pipe to quickly and primary sales people are working leads that are not really qualified. If you have a small organization of sales people, how do you qualify or rank leads before they get to the sales people.
Posted by: Jeff | June 02, 2005 at 12:39 AM
One of the advantages of Search Engine Marketing is the ability to actually measure the effects of the marketing. The web analytics solution I use allows me to create goals associated with desired actions like, downloads, opt-ins, etc. Just recently I had to strenuously encourage one of my clients to set up such measurements which required the use of a form. He didn't want forms on his site as he felt they were 'unfriendly'. I think the ability to measure the results outweighs any perceived disadvantage associated with the use of forms. This situation speaks the posts by Cliff and Brian regarding team alignment with the stated goals.
Posted by: John Robb | February 02, 2006 at 04:38 PM
We are cataloging a group of relevant articles on the issue of calculating Return on Marketing Investment for Blogging, forums and other Web2.0 PR tools. Feel free to visit http://del.icio.us/HowardPR/ROMI.
Posted by: Howard Oliver | June 18, 2007 at 06:56 AM